
Forever and Ever
There are few things that have the potential to be as powerfully divisive as public artwork. Apart from their own, individual artistic agendas, artworks commissioned for the public space serve as a representation of a society’s ideals – what a community deems worthwhile, worth funding, worth seeing on a daily basis. Conflict inevitably arises when communities are not accurately represented, or left out of the discussion entirely, or when the artist’s intention for the work is at odds with the goals of the commissioning body or the desires of a community. These conflicts can be positive, as they signify the continual ability of artwork to provoke and arouse. But as cultural producers, we must question how to best collaborate with and mediate the myriad of actors involved in the public sphere: artists, curators, community members, politicians, architects and urban planners. The below text explores one possible solution – increased understanding, support, and funding for temporary public artworks.
- EN
- 6 October 2017
- Essay